memeroyale: (Default)
memeroyale ([personal profile] memeroyale) wrote2003-07-22 08:58 pm

2014 BATTLE ROYALE SUGGESTIONS

From Twitter and the confessional:
- FLASHLIGHTS, book/box of matches
- More zones+buildings blowing up (and forbidden zone situation threads [supplies are left in the middle of forbidden zones, etc.])
- Activity check starts at 6,000, inactives blown up at 7,000
- More frequent situation threads (two a day?), continuity in threads (barn thread --> burning barn thread)
- Collar explosions should all be the same size (like in the movie? bigger explosions?)
- Deadcounts more organized+include everyone killed in the last 24 hours
- Villain/Boss RPed more seriously
- No children+animals

PLEASE FEEL FREE TO COMMENT HERE WITH ANY SUGGESTIONS YOU HAVE, I'd love to hear them, seriously! ouo

(Anonymous) 2013-07-23 01:25 am (UTC)(link)
- Kids/Animals blow up by 9000 comments if they're not already dead
- Anons should have at least three or four links for the activity check, and put themselves in a situation thread where they can be killed at least once

(Anonymous) 2013-07-23 01:29 am (UTC)(link)
That first one seems unfair. :| Why shouldn't they be allowed to win?

+1

(Anonymous) 2013-07-23 01:32 am (UTC)(link)
The meme is a silly place and the BR shouldn't be reserved for serious accounts only or exclude children just because some people are uncomfortable with it. Anyone should be allowed to enter and win, provided their character can do so without godmodding.



Also -1 to the second suggestion. Everyone should have the same requirement for the activity check. Anon discrimination on an anon meme is bad, m'kay.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-07-23 01:38 am (UTC)(link)
and then you get an anon replying with two links where they can't even be killed.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-07-23 01:41 am (UTC)(link)
And players with accounts can't do the same thing?

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-07-23 01:44 am (UTC)(link)
then require the same for players with accounts.

Re: +1

(Anonymous) 2013-07-23 01:49 am (UTC)(link)
Then that's fine.

As long as the rules are the same for everyone and anons/animals/kids aren't being singled out just because OP DOESN'T LIKE THEM WAHHH

(Anonymous) 2013-07-23 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
at least it's better than the "no children + animals" suggestion

-1

(Anonymous) 2013-07-24 03:08 am (UTC)(link)
I liked it too when players made their own threads.